Pacquiao, Cotto, and the savage nature of boxing
Related Links:
Comments
OK, fine with me (not that it matters).. a back-to-back, or even a trilogy with Floyd Mayweather, and then retire... anyway, Manny's condition now, is heaven & earth different from Ali's condition when he fought Holmes..
You know, I'm on Larry Merchant's side with the whole stopping the fight issue. I don't mind Kenny Bayless stepping in because the odds must have been a zillion-to-one at that point that Cotto would score a miraculous knockout blow, but Cotto wasn't in trouble. He wasn't out on his feet. He was defending himself and he was usually landing a couple pointless jabs at the beginning the rounds before running. He took one combination somewhere in the rounds 6-9 area that had him on the edge, but he survived it. He lost the fight badly, but he continued defending himself until the end and wanted to keep fighting. If you look at those Gatti-Ward fights or Corrales-Castillo, both fighters were in much worse shape than Cotto was at any point in the fight. Now, the fact that Cotto-Pacquiao wasn't at all close at that point is an important factor, but people have been writing about this like Cotto was being hit with a sledgehammer, and while I'm as impressed with the pambansang kamao as anyone, it didn't look that grave to me.
Another reason why boxers can't hang up the gloves that shouldn't be forgotten is money. Like other pro athletes, boxers lose their riches fast. Part of it is because of poor spending, and part of it is because boxing might be the world's most crooked major sport, and by the time all the promoters and handlers get their fees, the fighter's cut can be much smaller than it ought to be. Also, since many fighters allow their handlers to manage their finances, who knows what gets skimmed. It's not just glory that drives old, washed up greats into the ring, it's money. They need a payday. Since Pacquiao's at the top of the field, he's got more money than he knows what to do with, so it doesn't make much difference. But if he stops fighting, the faucet is turned off, and if he's still losing money at casinos and cockfights and billiard halls and playing pusoy dos at Chavit's lodge, then what?
Well, I think Bill Simmons would call me the turd in the punch bowl. Let's go back to thinking about the performance Pacquiao put on. It was amazing.
Another reason why boxers can't hang up the gloves that shouldn't be forgotten is money. Like other pro athletes, boxers lose their riches fast. Part of it is because of poor spending, and part of it is because boxing might be the world's most crooked major sport, and by the time all the promoters and handlers get their fees, the fighter's cut can be much smaller than it ought to be. Also, since many fighters allow their handlers to manage their finances, who knows what gets skimmed. It's not just glory that drives old, washed up greats into the ring, it's money. They need a payday. Since Pacquiao's at the top of the field, he's got more money than he knows what to do with, so it doesn't make much difference. But if he stops fighting, the faucet is turned off, and if he's still losing money at casinos and cockfights and billiard halls and playing pusoy dos at Chavit's lodge, then what?
Well, I think Bill Simmons would call me the turd in the punch bowl. Let's go back to thinking about the performance Pacquiao put on. It was amazing.
In one interview, Pacquiao said, "Hindi naman ako bobo." Though he splurges a lot (e.g. his mother's 6 million peso jewelry), he knows were to place his money. Unconfirmed reports say that the monthly interest from his money in the bank is about 15-20 millions pesos. He could spend all that in a month and still keep his principal.
i agree with your post right there, in many ways, boxing is still a brutal sport, but like many other sports it evolves through time. truly science has come to play a very important part in today's sporting scene. from training to the fight itself everything has to be done with method, efficiency and utmost care for the athlete. of course in boxing there are a lot of bleeders, and cutmans will do their best to reduce (for at least that moment) the amount of damage their fighter has sustained. i can't say that today's boxing not that brutal, but clearly, with the evolution of the sport, rules, sanctions and regulations, we must still appreciate that it is still a sport, and as cheesy as it gets it is "the sweet science". maybe those who say that boxing is still a brutal bloodsport still can't get this image in their minds, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VawHgrLvbD4. and i do hope that we won't see that again.
thank you sir.
thank you sir.


